123456789
10/25/2006, 06:43 PM
Well, I just started a course in web design at a technical school nearby. It's something I've wanted to do for quite some time now, and I think it'll be quite a bit of fun. I'm three days into a ten month course (incl. a two month internship) and I'm starting to learn to do things the 'professional' way - read efficiently and fast, but I digress.
The thing is that the screen I have at home is a CRT and the one at school is a flat screen. What a HUGE difference. For one, the image on the flat screen changes depending on the viewing angle. For two, the brightness, colour, contrast, etc... is not just different, it's bizarre. I'm sure I'll get used to it but I'm also sure I don't think it is as good. To compare, I looked at my old PA contest entries and if they would have looked like that at home, I never would have entered most of them (especially this last Hallowe'en one.) The noise I added was accentuated beyond subtlety and the lighting was completely different. I'm not trying to find excuses, I'm trying to figure out which is more accurate. I find the flat screen much brighter (lighter) and I can't get the image to match the look of my monitor at home.
Am I a dinosaur, am I alone, am I imagining things (the neons in the class are much brighter than my ambient lighting at home,) or are there others who see what I mean? I'd like to know what you all think of CRT vs. flat screen.
The thing is that the screen I have at home is a CRT and the one at school is a flat screen. What a HUGE difference. For one, the image on the flat screen changes depending on the viewing angle. For two, the brightness, colour, contrast, etc... is not just different, it's bizarre. I'm sure I'll get used to it but I'm also sure I don't think it is as good. To compare, I looked at my old PA contest entries and if they would have looked like that at home, I never would have entered most of them (especially this last Hallowe'en one.) The noise I added was accentuated beyond subtlety and the lighting was completely different. I'm not trying to find excuses, I'm trying to figure out which is more accurate. I find the flat screen much brighter (lighter) and I can't get the image to match the look of my monitor at home.
Am I a dinosaur, am I alone, am I imagining things (the neons in the class are much brighter than my ambient lighting at home,) or are there others who see what I mean? I'd like to know what you all think of CRT vs. flat screen.